2016-10-28 16:05, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 10/28/2016 03:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-10-28 13:50, Andrew Rybchenko: > >> First of all I'd like to double check that it is clear that we discuss > >> libefx > >> (base driver in terms of DPDK) import here. The PMD itself is already split > >> in 20+ patches. > > I don't know libefx. In DPDK, a base driver is often a subdirectory > > inside the PMD. Will it be the case? > > Yes. Just to be absolutely sure: are the discussed requirements to split > applicable to base driver import?
Yes I'm talking about the base driver. But they are not some requirements. Take them as advices. The first priority is to welcome your new driver. The second priority is to make sure that it is open and readable enough.
