> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kulasek, TomaszX
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 1:49 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] ethdev: add Tx preparation
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 14:15
> > To: Kulasek, TomaszX <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] ethdev: add Tx preparation
> >
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * Fix pseudo header checksum
> > > + *
> > > + * This function fixes pseudo header checksum for TSO and non-TSO
> > > +tcp/udp in
> > > + * provided mbufs packet data.
> > > + *
> > > + * - for non-TSO tcp/udp packets full pseudo-header checksum is counted
> > and set
> > > + * in packet data,
> > > + * - for TSO the IP payload length is not included in pseudo header.
> > > + *
> > > + * This function expects that used headers are in the first data
> > > +segment of
> > > + * mbuf, and are not fragmented.
> > > + *
> > > + * @param m
> > > + * The packet mbuf to be validated.
> > > + * @return
> > > + * 0 if checksum is initialized properly
> > > + */
> > > +static inline int
> > > +rte_phdr_cksum_fix(struct rte_mbuf *m) {
> > > + struct ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr;
> > > + struct ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr;
> > > + struct tcp_hdr *tcp_hdr;
> > > + struct udp_hdr *udp_hdr;
> > > + uint64_t ol_flags = m->ol_flags;
> > > + uint64_t inner_l3_offset = m->l2_len;
> > > +
> > > + if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM)
> > > + inner_l3_offset += m->outer_l2_len + m->outer_l3_len;
> > > +
> > > + /* headers are fragmented */
> > > + if (unlikely(rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m) >= inner_l3_offset + m->l3_len
> > +
> > > + m->l4_len))
> >
> > Might be better to move that check into rte_validate_tx_offload(), so it
> > would be called only when TX_DEBUG is on.
>
> While unfragmented headers are not general requirements for Tx offloads, and
> this requirement is for this particular implementation,
> maybe for performance reasons will be better to keep it here, and just add
> #if DEBUG to leave rte_validate_tx_offload more generic.
Hmm and what is the advantage to pollute that code with more ifdefs?
Again, why unfragmented headers are not general requirements?
As long as DPDK pseudo-headear csum calculation routines can't handle
fragmented case,
it pretty much is a general requirement, no?
Konstantin
>
> > Another thing, shouldn't it be:
> > if (rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m) < inner_l3_offset + m->l3_len + m->l4_len) ?
>
> Yes, it should.
>
> > Konstantin
> >
>
> Tomasz
