2016-09-29 16:42, Aaron Conole: > Flavio Leitner <fbl at sysclose.org> writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:43:37AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > >> My only concern is whether this change would be considered ABI > >> breaking. I wouldn't think so, since it doesn't seem as though an > >> application would want to call this explicitly (and is spelled out as > >> such), but I can't be sure that it isn't already included in the > >> standard application API, and therefore needs to go through the change > >> process. > > > > I didn't want to change the original behavior more than needed. > > > > I think another patch would be necessary to change the whole EAL > > initialization because there's a bunch of rte_panic() there which > > aren't friendly with callers either.
Yes please, we need to remove all those panic/exit calls. > Okay makes sense. > > Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> Applied, thanks
