On 11/30/2016 2:26 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > Hi Ferruh: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yigit, Ferruh >> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 1:46 AM >> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at >> intel.com>; >> Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang at intel.com> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] net/i40e: enable auto link update for >> XXV710 >> >> Hi Qi, >> >> On 11/24/2016 11:43 PM, Qi Zhang wrote: >>> This patch remove the limitation that XXV710 device does >> >> XXV710 is 25G device, and support added in 16.11 (please correct me if this >> is >> wrong.), but I can't find any DPDK documentation for this device. >> >> Can you please add some documentation, at least to http://dpdk.org/doc/nics >> and http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/nics/i40e.html >> in a different patch? > > For 16.11, since XXV710 is not officially supported, so they are missing in > document. > For 17.02 this will be updated. Thanks for remind.
If officially will be added on 17.02, can you please update release notes too, to announce new device support? >> >>> not support auto link update. >> >> Can you please add more details that why we can remove the limitation now? > Ok, will update in v2. >> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 8 ++++---- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c >>> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 67778ba..b7a916d 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c >>> @@ -1628,6 +1628,8 @@ i40e_phy_conf_link(struct i40e_hw *hw, >>> >>> /* use get_phy_abilities_resp value for the rest */ >>> phy_conf.phy_type = phy_ab.phy_type; >>> + phy_conf.phy_type_ext = phy_ab.phy_type_ext; >>> + phy_conf.fec_config = phy_ab.mod_type_ext; >> >> And these changes look like called for all device types, just to double >> check, are >> these 25G specific? > > Actually only XXV710 need this two lines, but base on firmware engineer's > input, > this could be implemented in generic way since no impact for other i40e > devices. >> >>> phy_conf.eee_capability = phy_ab.eee_capability; >>> phy_conf.eeer = phy_ab.eeer_val; >>> phy_conf.low_power_ctrl = phy_ab.d3_lpan; @@ -1653,8 +1655,7 @@ >>> i40e_apply_link_speed(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) >>> struct rte_eth_conf *conf = &dev->data->dev_conf; >>> >>> speed = i40e_parse_link_speeds(conf->link_speeds); >>> - if (!I40E_PHY_TYPE_SUPPORT_25G(hw->phy.phy_types)) >>> - abilities |= I40E_AQ_PHY_ENABLE_ATOMIC_LINK; >>> + abilities |= I40E_AQ_PHY_ENABLE_ATOMIC_LINK; >>> if (!(conf->link_speeds & ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED)) >>> abilities |= I40E_AQ_PHY_AN_ENABLED; >>> abilities |= I40E_AQ_PHY_LINK_ENABLED; @@ -1990,8 +1991,7 @@ >>> i40e_dev_set_link_down(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) >>> uint8_t abilities = 0; >>> struct i40e_hw *hw = >> I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private); >>> >>> - if (!I40E_PHY_TYPE_SUPPORT_25G(hw->phy.phy_types)) >>> - abilities = I40E_AQ_PHY_ENABLE_ATOMIC_LINK; >>> + abilities = I40E_AQ_PHY_ENABLE_ATOMIC_LINK; >>> return i40e_phy_conf_link(hw, abilities, speed); } >>> >>> > Thanks! > Qi >
