Hi Ferruh,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 8:58 PM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] e1000 base code update > > Hi Wenzhuo, > > On 11/23/2016 5:22 PM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote: > > Updated e1000 base code to fix several bugs and support > > i219 NICs. > > > > Wenzhuo Lu (16): > > e1000/base: increased ULP timer > > e1000/base: increase PHY PLL clock gate timing > > e1000/base: try more times to get HW mailbox lock > > e1000/base: add getting HW version support for i354 > > e1000/base: expose e1000_write_vfta_i350 > > e1000/base: add max RX jumbo frame define > > e1000/base: restore link speed after ULP exit > > e1000/base: clear ULP configuration register on ULP exit > > e1000/base: increase LANPHYPC low duration > > e1000/base: workaround for ULP entry flow > > e1000/base: enable new i219 devices > > e1000/base: always request clock during K1 at 1G link speed > > e1000/base: ability to force K1-off disabled > > e1000/base: support more i219 devices > > e1000/base: update readme > > e1000: add new i219 devices > > > > drivers/net/e1000/base/README | 4 +- > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82575.c | 1 - > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_82575.h | 1 + > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_api.c | 19 + > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_defines.h | 9 + > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_hw.h | 21 +- > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_ich8lan.c | 865 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_ich8lan.h | 21 +- > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_mbx.c | 36 +- > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_nvm.c | 1 + > > drivers/net/e1000/base/e1000_regs.h | 7 + > > drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 34 +- > > 12 files changed, 949 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) > > > > Based on this pathset. > > Can you also please send another patch to: > 1- add I219 to supported nics list > 2- announce new supported nic in release notes. > > Also as far as I can see there is no igb/e1000 documentation under > doc/guides/nics/*, it can good to provide one, not with above requested > patches perhaps, but in some suitable time. I'll handle them. Thanks for the reminder :) > > Thanks, > Ferruh
