On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 03:46:38AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:21:43PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hi
> > >
> > > i40e_asq_send_command: rd32 & wr32 under ThunderX gives unpredictable
> > > results. To solve this include rte memory barriers
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Satha Rao <skoteshwar at caviumnetworks.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h
> > > b/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h
> > > index 38e7ba5..ffa3160 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h
> > > @@ -158,7 +158,13 @@ do {
> > > \
> > > ((volatile uint32_t *)((char *)(a)->hw_addr + (reg)))
> > > static inline uint32_t i40e_read_addr(volatile void *addr)
> > > {
> > > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> > > + uint32_t val = rte_le_to_cpu_32(I40E_PCI_REG(addr));
> > > + rte_rmb();
> > > + return val;
> >
> > If you really need an rmb/wmb with MMIO read/writes on ARM,
> > I think you can avoid #ifdefs here and use rte_smp_rmb/rte_smp_wmb.
> > BTW, I suppose if you need it for i40e, you would need it for other devices
> > too.
>
> Yes. ARM would need for all devices(typically, the devices on external PCI
> bus).
> I guess rte_smp_rmb may not be the correct abstraction. So we need more of
> rte_rmb() as we need only non smp variant on IO side. I guess then it make
> sense to
> create new abstraction in eal with following variants so that each arch
> gets opportunity to make what it makes sense that specific platform
>
> rte_readb_relaxed
> rte_readw_relaxed
> rte_readl_relaxed
> rte_readq_relaxed
> rte_writeb_relaxed
> rte_writew_relaxed
> rte_writel_relaxed
> rte_writeq_relaxed
> rte_readb
> rte_readw
> rte_readl
> rte_readq
> rte_writeb
> rte_writew
> rte_writel
> rte_writeq
>
> Thoughts ?
>
That seems like a lot of API calls!
Perhaps you can clarify - why would the rte_smp_rmb() not work for you?
/Bruce
