On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:11:12PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
>
> Do you mind if we put back this conversation on the ML?
Oh, I forgot to do it ? I intended to. Bummer. Please do so.
> I think your example shows that there is no linker magic: you just
> need the same linker flags for dpdk libraries than in the dpdk
> framework. I suppose we need something in the build framework
> to provide these flags externally,
Good luck integrating that in all foreign build system (I'm
looking at you, Snort).
> but I don't think we need to patch mempool for that.
This sanity check is just that, a sanity check. I don't
understand what's bad about a sanity check, it does not change
functionality, it does not fix anything and just warn users about
those issues.
Please look at the patch itself at face value.
> Regards,
> Olivier
Regards,
Jean
