2016-11-09 11:05, Bj?rn T?pel: > > BTW, all other examples would experience same problem too, right? > > Correct, so the broader question would be "what is the correct behavior > for an example application, when a port configuration isn't supported by > the hardware?". > > My stand, FWIW, is that igb and ixgbe should have the same semantics as > i40e currently has, i.e. return an error to the user if the port is > mis-configured, NOT changing the setting behind the users back.
Yes it sounds sane.
