On 11/03/2016 05:09 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> Instead of setting up a queue memzone name like "port0_rxq0", "port0_txq0",
> it could be simplified a bit to something like "port0_vq0", "port0_vq1" ...
>
> Meanwhile, the code is also simplified a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c 
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> index 5815875..d082df5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,6 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>       struct virtnet_tx *txvq = NULL;
>       struct virtnet_ctl *cvq = NULL;
>       struct virtqueue *vq;
> -     const char *queue_names[] = {"rvq", "txq", "cvq"};
>       size_t sz_vq, sz_q = 0, sz_hdr_mz = 0;
>       void *sw_ring = NULL;
>       int ret;
> @@ -335,8 +334,8 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>
> -     snprintf(vq_name, sizeof(vq_name), "port%d_%s%d",
> -              dev->data->port_id, queue_names[queue_type], queue_idx);
> +     snprintf(vq_name, sizeof(vq_name), "port%d_vq%d",
> +              dev->data->port_id, vtpci_queue_idx);
>
>       sz_vq = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(sizeof(*vq) +
>                               vq_size * sizeof(struct vq_desc_extra),
> @@ -398,9 +397,8 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>                    (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)mz->addr);
>
>       if (sz_hdr_mz) {
> -             snprintf(vq_hdr_name, sizeof(vq_hdr_name), "port%d_%s%d_hdr",
> -                      dev->data->port_id, queue_names[queue_type],
> -                      queue_idx);
> +             snprintf(vq_hdr_name, sizeof(vq_hdr_name), "port%d_vq%d_hdr",
> +                      dev->data->port_id, vtpci_queue_idx);
>               hdr_mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(vq_hdr_name, sz_hdr_mz,
>                                                    socket_id, 0,
>                                                    RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>

Sounds reasonable:
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Reply via email to