> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Kerur
> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 7:01 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] Test cases for rte_memcmp functions
>
> v1:
> This patch adds test cases for rte_memcmp functions.
> New rte_memcmp functions can be tested via 'make test'
> and 'testpmd' utility.
>
> Compiled and tested on Ubuntu 14.04(non-NUMA) and
> 15.10(NUMA) systems.
[...]
> +/************************************************************
> *******************
> + * Memcmp function performance test configuration section. Each performance
> test
> + * will be performed MEMCMP_ITERATIONS times.
> + *
> + * The five arrays below control what tests are performed. Every combination
> + * from the array entries is tested.
> + */
> +#define MEMCMP_ITERATIONS (500 * 500 * 500)
Maybe less iteration will make the test faster without compromise precison?
> +
> +static size_t memcmp_sizes[] = {
> + 2, 5, 8, 9, 15, 16, 17, 31, 32, 33, 63, 64, 65, 127, 128,
> + 129, 191, 192, 193, 255, 256, 257, 319, 320, 321, 383, 384,
> + 385, 447, 448, 449, 511, 512, 513, 767, 768, 769, 1023, 1024,
> + 1025, 1522, 1536, 1600, 2048, 2560, 3072, 3584, 4096, 4608,
> + 5632, 6144, 6656, 7168, 7680, 8192, 16834
> +};
> +
[...]
> +/*
> + * Do all performance tests.
> + */
> +static int
> +test_memcmp_perf(void)
> +{
> + if (run_all_memcmp_eq_perf_tests() != 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (run_all_memcmp_gt_perf_tests() != 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (run_all_memcmp_lt_perf_tests() != 0)
> + return -1;
> +
Perhaps unaligned test cases are needed here.
How do you think?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct test_command memcmp_perf_cmd = {
> + .command = "memcmp_perf_autotest",
> + .callback = test_memcmp_perf,
> +};
> +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(memcmp_perf_cmd);
> --
> 1.9.1
