Hi Slawomir, On 05/12/2016 02:46 PM, Slawomir Mrozowicz wrote: > Fix issue reported by Coverity. > > Coverity ID 13243: Division or modulo by zero > In function call rte_mempool_xmem_size, division by expression total_size > which may be zero has undefined behavior. > > Fixes: 148f963fb532 ("xen: core library changes") > > Signed-off-by: Slawomir Mrozowicz <slawomirx.mrozowicz at intel.com> > --- > lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c > b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c > index f8781e1..01668c1 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c > +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c > @@ -327,15 +327,19 @@ rte_mempool_calc_obj_size(uint32_t elt_size, uint32_t > flags, > size_t > rte_mempool_xmem_size(uint32_t elt_num, size_t elt_sz, uint32_t pg_shift) > { > - size_t n, pg_num, pg_sz, sz; > + size_t n, pg_num, pg_sz; > + size_t sz = 0; > > - pg_sz = (size_t)1 << pg_shift; > + if (elt_sz > 0) { > + pg_sz = (size_t)1 << pg_shift; > + n = pg_sz / elt_sz; > > - if ((n = pg_sz / elt_sz) > 0) { > - pg_num = (elt_num + n - 1) / n; > - sz = pg_num << pg_shift; > - } else { > - sz = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(elt_sz, pg_sz) * elt_num; > + if (n > 0) { > + pg_num = (elt_num + n - 1) / n; > + sz = pg_num << pg_shift; > + } else { > + sz = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(elt_sz, pg_sz) * elt_num; > + } > } > > return sz; >
I think it would be clearer (either for the patch and the code) to avoid an additional indent, and do something like that: size_t rte_mempool_xmem_size(uint32_t elt_num, size_t elt_sz, uint32_t pg_shift) { if (elt_sz == 0) return 0; /* same code as before */ It will also facilitate the merge with http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12057/ Could you please submit a v2 with this logic? Thanks, Olivier