No, I don't have any idea? :) On 10 May 2016 at 12:12, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy < sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com> wrote:
> Have you tried to run the unit tests? (Run 'app/test' application, then > 'malloc_autotest') > > Sergio > > > On 10/05/2016 16:55, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: > > #!/bin/sh > ./build/app/Mahdi_test -c 0x55 --master-lcore 0 > > On 10 May 2016 at 11:31, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy < > sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com> wrote: > >> Forgot to ask, >> >> What's the command line you are using to run the app? >> >> Sergio >> >> >> On 10/05/2016 16:17, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: >> >> Thanks Sergio, >> Yes sure, >> I attached files, it seems so easy but doesn't work. >> Thanks, >> >> On 10 May 2016 at 04:12, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy < >> <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 09/05/2016 18:32, Mahdi Moradmand Badie wrote: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> I had a problem regarding use the rte_malloc. >>>> I want to know if I want to use rte_malloc instead of malloc just mak >>>> change like this >>>> struct lcore_params *p = malloc >>>> < >>>> http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__malloc_8h.html#afb7316a4ec228ed9b8ffc1864b03d85b >>>> > >>>> (sizeof(*p)); ==> >>>> struct lcore_params *p = rte_malloc >>>> < >>>> http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__malloc_8h.html#afb7316a4ec228ed9b8ffc1864b03d85b >>>> >(NULL, >>>> sizeof(*p), 0); >>>> is enough ? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, malloc(sizeof(*p)) has an equivalent behavior to rte_malloc(NULL, >>> sizeof(*p), 0) >>> in the context of a DPDK application. >>> >>> Because I have problem and Segmentation fault (core dumped) ?? >>>> >>> >>> Could you provide more details of how to reproduce or could you try to >>> reproduce your problem using a very simple example like >>> examples/helloworld ? >>> >>> Sergio >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> M at hdi Mor at dm@nd B at die >> >> >> > > > -- > M at hdi Mor at dm@nd B at die > > > -- M at hdi Mor at dm@nd B at die
