Hi Wenzhuo, Thanks. For some reason, we have to stick to dpdk 2.0 for now. Is multi-segment mbuf supported in this version (any known issue with multi-seg in this version?) or do we have to upgrade to latest dpdk version for multi-segment support?
Clarylin > On Mar 28, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com> wrote: > > > Hi Clarylin, > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Clarylin L >> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 4:24 AM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] is ixgbe supporting multi-segment mbuf? >> >> ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts was set to be the rx function. Receiving packets > I see this function is already deprecated. Do you use an old version? Would > you like to try the newest code? > >> smaller than mbuf size works perfectly. However, if an incoming packet is >> greater than the maximum acceptable length of one ?mbuf? data size, receiving >> does not work. In this case, isn't it supposed to use mbuf chaining to >> receive? >> >> The port has both jumbo_frame and enable_scatter being on. are these two >> flags good enough to make mbuf chaining going?
