On 3/18/2016 5:55 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > Hi all. > And what about first patch of this series: > "vhost: use SMP barriers instead of compiler ones." ? > > It's not about thread safety in terms of 'lockless'. It is the standalone > patch that fixes many times discussed issue with barriers on arm. > > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. Right, for ARM. I put a comment there. Btw, could you add -in-reply-to when you send you next patch?
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vhost: use SMP barriers... Thomas Monjalon
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 2/3] vhost: make buf vector for s... Ilya Maximets
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 3/3] vhost: avoid reordering of u... Ilya Maximets
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Thread safe rte_vhost_enqueu... Thomas Monjalon
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Thread safe rte_vhost_e... Yuanhan Liu
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Thread safe rte_vho... Thomas Monjalon
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Thread safe rte... Yuanhan Liu
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Thread safe... Thomas Monjalon
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Thread... Yuanhan Liu
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Th... Ilya Maximets
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Th... Xie, Huawei
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Th... Thomas Monjalon