> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:46 AM > To: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at redhat.com>; David > Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com>; Zhang, Helin > <helin.zhang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] slow data path communication > between DPDK port and Linux > > > > We can't remove it. > > Why?
There are a lot of people using KNI. > > We can't replace/improve it -you were one of the major opposition to this. > > This doesn't leave more option other than using it. > > Why cannot we replace it by something upstream? In theory it could be upstreamed. Let's see how we get on with upstreaming the KCP component first. John
