Hi, Bruce That is because another patch was applied before this one. I will rework it, and send it soon.
Thanks Jingjing > -----Original Message----- > From: Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 8:22 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin; Tao, Zhe > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] i40evf: allocate virtchnl cmd buffer for each vf > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:41:10AM +0800, Jingjing Wu wrote: > > Currently, i40evf PMD uses a global static buffer to send virtchnl > > command to host driver. It is shared by multi VFs. > > This patch changed to allocate virtchnl cmd buffer for each VF. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com> > > Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang at intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 2 + > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 178 > > +++++++++++++++----------------------- > > 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-) > > > Hi Jingjing, > > I get some compilation errors when I apply this to dpdk-next-net. > > /home/bruce/next-net/dpdk-next-net/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c: > In function ?i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr?: > /home/bruce/next-net/dpdk-next- > net/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c:1801:21: error: ?cmd_result_buffer? > undeclared (first use in this function) > args.out_buffer = cmd_result_buffer; > ^ > > This is with Fedora 23 with gcc 5.3.1 > > /Bruce
