2016-03-11 14:53, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > On 11/03/2016 13:33, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-03-11 11:47, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > >> On 11/03/2016 11:39, Jan Viktorin wrote: > >>> Hello Sergio, > >>> > >>> I've detected a build regression for the ARMv7. It seems to me the > >>> source of the problem is the following commit: > >>> > >>> > >>> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=d299106e8e31a622b3a1c1653f7795fa8a55860e > >>> > >>> The ipsec-secgw should be compiled only when LPM is enabled. See, eg. > >>> how the l3fwd-power example is done in examples/Makefile. > >> Right! > >> > >> Actually the app has dependencies on a few libraries, so I'll fix that. > > Please take the opportunity to move the crypto examples in the > > alphabetical order in this Makefile. Thanks > > > > > > So the fix is easy enough but I'm really not a fan of cluttering the > examples/Makefile ifeq checks > which would only avoid building ipsec-secgw if doing: > $ make examples > > but would still fail to build if doing something like: > $ make -C examples/ipsec-secgw
If you explicitly want to build this example, it is normal to fail. > examples/Makefile: > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL),y) > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_HASH),y) > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_LPM),y) > DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_CRYPTODEV) += ipsec-secgw > +endif > +endif > +endif You can do it in one line: ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL)$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_HASH)$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_LPM),yyy) > Another way to achive this and also avoid building the app with 'make -C > ...' is something like this: > > examples/ipsec-secgw/Makefile: > +all: > +%: > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL),y) > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_HASH),y) > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_LPM),y) > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_CRYPTODEV),y) > include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.extapp.mk > +endif > +endif > +endif > +endif No, as said above, you should not be smart here and let it fail. > Anyway, none of those are the right fix, which I think should be > something along the lines of Kconfig. Yes maybe one day... > Any preference? First one