> -----Original Message----- > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 4:04 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> > Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; > Kobylinski, MichalX <michalx.kobylinski at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: merge tbl24 and tbl8 structures > Importance: High > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 03:57:43PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2015-11-24 14:25, Bruce Richardson: > > > The tbl8 and tbl24 structures were essentially identical except for > > > slightly different names for one or two fields. Merge these two > > > structures into a single structure definition. > > > > > > Two fields have been renamed as part of this change: the "ext_entry" > > > field in the tbl24 has been renamed to "valid_group" to match the > > > tbl8 value to make the merge easier, and the "tbl8_gindex" field has > > > been renamed to "group_idx". The "valid_group" field now serves two > > > purposes: in a tbl8 it indicates if the group, i.e. the tbl8, is > > > valid, and in a tbl24, it indicates if the "group_idx" is valid, > > > i.e. whether the value is a next_hop or a tbl8 index. [The name > > > "group_idx" was used to make this latter link between the fields > > > clearer] > > > > > > Suggested-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv at gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> > > > > This patch was forgotten. > > Michal, Jerin, maybe you'll have to rebase on top of it.
ok, I'll rebase on top of it. > > I wait for Michal to send the next version. I will the v5 rebased on Michal > patch. > > Jerin > > > > > Applied, thanks
