2016-03-01 08:29, Panu Matilainen:
> DPDK_2.3 {
> global:
>
> rte_eth_dev_get_ptype_info;
>
> local: *;
> } DPDK_2.2;
>
> ...but if there are no other reasons to respin the series perhaps Thomas
> can fixup that while applying.
>
> Then there's the actual version, which should optimally be DPDK_16.04
> but that's purely cosmetical. There are a number of patches floating
> around with DPDK_2.3 {} and librte_eal actually has one on board, so
> clearly the dust from versioning change has not yet settled.
Yes it must be 16.04.
I've just sent a patch for EAL:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-March/034266.html
Thanks
