On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:00:16PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-29 17:27, Bruce Richardson:
> > Fix this by introducing two new functions to replace the old ones,
> > * rte_mempool_avail_count to replace rte_mempool_count
> > * rte_mempool_in_use_count to replace rte_mempool_free_count
>
> This patch needs to be rebased please.
>
> > --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_version.map
> > +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_version.map
> > @@ -32,5 +32,6 @@ DPDK_16.07 {
> > rte_mempool_populate_virt;
> > rte_mempool_register_ops;
> > rte_mempool_set_ops_byname;
> > + rte_mempool_avail_count;
>
> The "in_use_count" function is missing.
> Please keep alphabetical order.
We need a search-replace function that is smart enough to reorder things for us!
