Hi Jan,
On Friday 06 May 2016 07:18 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin at rehivetech.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 127
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 31 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> index 4af2e5f..9259c2c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -320,6 +320,99 @@ rte_eth_dev_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
> }
>
[...]
> +int
> rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(uint8_t port_id)
> {
> if (port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS ||
> @@ -1431,7 +1524,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_info_get(uint8_t port_id, struct
> rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>
> RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get);
> (*dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get)(dev, dev_info);
> - dev_info->pci_dev = dev->pci_dev;
> + dev_info->soc_dev = dev->soc_dev;
I think both the members, pci_dev and soc_dev, should be updated by this call.
Is there some specific reason why soc_dev is the only one which is getting
updated?
> dev_info->driver_name = dev->data->drv_name;
> }
>
[...]
-
Shreyansh
