Hi Thomas,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:17 PM > To: Jerin Jacob > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo; Ananyev, Konstantin; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org; > Richardson, Bruce; Chen, Jing D; Liang, Cunming; Wu, Jingjing; Zhang, Helin > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] lib/librte_ether: support device reset > > 2016-06-22 13:29, Jerin Jacob: > > Thomas, > > As a librte_ether maintainer any comments on this? > > +1 for adding details and make sure naming is good. > I don't really need to comment here because I have already done this comment > earlier: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/041845.html > Thank you for insisting. I've add some details in this patch set. If it's not enough, please let me know. And I think this discussion is about what the API name should be like. Actually I think all the existing name is describing what is done by the API not when and where it should be used, like dev_start/stop. But anyway I'm open for changing the name. Is the name process_reset_intr you prefer? Thanks.
