> -----Original Message-----
> From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:13 PM
> To: Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 5/5] testpmd: show topology at forwarding start
>
>
> Hi Zhihong,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wang, Zhihong
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 4:28 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; Richardson, Bruce; De Lara Guarch, Pablo;
> > thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; Wang, Zhihong
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] testpmd: show topology at forwarding start
> >
> > This patch show topology at forwarding start.
> >
> > "show config fwd" also does this, but showing it directly can reduce the
> > possibility of misconfiguration.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang at intel.com>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > index 9b1d99c..b946034 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ start_packet_forwarding(int with_tx_first)
> > if(!no_flush_rx)
> > flush_fwd_rx_queues();
> >
> > - fwd_config_setup();
> > + fwd_config_setup_display();
>
> Bernard has made a patch that separates the display and setup of the
> configuration,
> (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/13650/)
> so fwd_config_display() does not call fwd_config_setup() anymore.
>
> Could you modify this patch, so you call fwd_config_setup() and
> fwd_config_display()?
Thanks for the info! I've updated this patch with a v3.
Could you please help review?
>
> Sorry for the confusion,
> Pablo
>
> > rxtx_config_display();
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_ports; i++) {
