Hi John and Nelson, I have a question regarding Coverity defects:
File: /drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c Line: 379 CID 13197: Unchecked return value (CHECKED_RETURN)1.?check_return:?Calling?rte_atomic64_cmpset?without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 15 out of 17 times) Can I mark this error as "False Positive" in Coverity Classification ? reason: 1. Function returns a void type so change the return type to int requires changes all drivers 2. rte_atomic64_cmpset is at the end of function so nonsense added a return What is your opinion? Regards, Marcin
