>-----Original Message----- >From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio >Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 10:15 AM >To: Mrozowicz, SlawomirX <slawomirx.mrozowicz at intel.com> >Cc: dev at dpdk.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: Calling risky function > >On 07/06/2016 09:58, Slawomir Mrozowicz wrote: >> lrand48 should not be used for security related applications, as >> linear congruential algorithms are too easy to break. >> Used a compliant random number generator /dev/urandom. >> >> Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample >> application") Coverity ID 124558 >> >> Signed-off-by: Slawomir Mrozowicz <slawomirx.mrozowicz at intel.com> >> --- > >I understand that lrand48 is not crypto secure, but this fix will kill >performance. > >I already have a solution for this issue to be included in the next IPSec patch >set that will also add support for GCM/CTR modes. > >Sergio
Thanks for your reply. So for now I propose to set this problem as intentional in the Coverity tool. S?awomir