> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Gonzalez
> Monroy
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:42 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Mcnamara, John
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] examples/ipsec-secgw: rework ipsec
> execution loop
>
> Rework implementation moving from function pointers approach, where
> each
> function implements very specific functionality, to a generic function
> approach.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>
> ---
> examples/ipsec-secgw/esp.c | 8 +-
> examples/ipsec-secgw/esp.h | 9 +-
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c | 36 ++++--
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h | 2 -
> examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c | 272
> ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 5 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/esp.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/esp.c
> index 7dce78c..b423080 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/esp.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/esp.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ random_iv_u64(uint64_t *buf, uint16_t n)
>
> /* IPv4 Tunnel */
You removed this comment in the header file, so probably you should do the same
here?
> int
> -esp4_tunnel_inbound_pre_crypto(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> +esp_inbound(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> struct rte_crypto_op *cop)
> {
> int32_t payload_len;
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ esp4_tunnel_inbound_pre_crypto(struct rte_mbuf
> *m, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> }
