On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:29:39PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> The patches will work on below patch series.
> - [PATCH v5 0/8] virtio support for container
>
> It seems his implementation will be changed a bit.
> So, this patch series are also going to be changed to follow his
> implementation.
Hi Tetsuya,
TBH, I was considering to reject your v4: the code was quite messy. But
this v5 changed my mind a bit: it's much cleaner.
But still, I'd ask do we really need 2 virtio for container solutions?
That results to the same question that I'm sure you have already
answered before: in which way your solution outweighs Jianfeng's?
The reason I want to ask again is: 1), I wasn't actively participating
the discussion in last release, besides some common comments on virtio,
2), maybe it's time to make a decision that should we take one solution
only, if so, which one, or should we take both?
Thomas is Cc'ed, hope he can help on the decision making.
--yliu
