On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:35:46 +0200 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote:
> There was a prior call with an explanation of what needs to be done: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/040844.html > - Qemu patch upstreamed > - IVSHMEM PCI device managed by a PCI driver > - No DPDK objects (ring/mempool) allocated by EAL > > As nobody seems interested, it is time to remove this code which > makes EAL improvements harder. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> > Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com> > Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com> Acked-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin at rehivetech.com
