> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Viktorin [mailto:viktorin at rehivetech.com] > Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 4:01 PM > To: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov at intel.com> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; David Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com>; Wiles, > Keith <keith.wiles at intel.com>; Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com>; > Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>; Shreyansh Jain > <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] vfio: fix include of eal_private.h to be local > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:22:08 +0000 > "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov at intel.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > There's no patch cover letter so I'll reply to the first patch. I've done > > some > cursory testing with a NIC, nothing seems to be broken and the code looks > OK to me. So, once this patchset is rebased on latest master (patches 9, 14 > and 15 no longer apply cleanly), ack from me. > > I am going to post v3. Should I include the ACKs on all patches or will you > post > them yourself? >
I'll test the patchset again and ack the patchset. Thanks!
