On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:44:59AM +0000, Van Haaren, Harry wrote: > > From: Richardson, Bruce > > The details of what the config file is should largely be hidden from the > > user > > IMHO. > > Agreed, however hiding it totally removes the flexibility of waiting for a > primary > that is starting with --file-prefix (aka: in a non-default location). Imposing > a limit on only monitoring primary procs in the default location seems wrong. >
But the secondary also needs the same prefix. Is that prefix not accessible by this function to be used? /Bruce
