Hi Tetsuya,
> Hi Jianfeng and Xie, > > I guess my implementation and yours have a lot of common code, so I will > try to rebase my patch on yours. We also think so. And before you rebase your code, I think we can rely on Yuanhan's struct virtio_pci_ops to make the code structure brief and clear, as discussed in your patch's thread, i.e., we both rebase our code according to Yuanhan's code. Is that OK? > > BTW, one thing I need to change your memory allocation way is that > mmaped address should be under 44bit(32 + PAGE_SHIFT) to work with my patch. > This is because VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_PFN register only accepts such address. > (I may need to add one more EAL parameter like "--mmap-under <address>") It makes sense. Thanks, Jianfeng > > Thanks, > Tetsuya
