Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Fedin [mailto:p.fedin at samsung.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:05 PM > To: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan at intel.com> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] add dpdk packet capture support for > tcpdump > > Hello! > > > > 2. What if i don't want separate RX and TX streams either? It only > > > prevents me from seeing the complete picture. > > > > Do you mean not to have separate pcap files for tx and rx? If so, I > > would prefer to keep this as it is. > > I mean - add an option not to have separate files.
OK, I will make changes in v3. > > > > 3. vhostuser ports are missing. Perhaps not really related to this > > > patchset, i just don't know how much code "server" part of vhostuser > > > shares with normal PMDs, but anyway, ability to dump them too would be > nice to have. > > > > > > > I think this can be done in future i.e. when vhost as PMD is > > available. But as of now vhost is library. > > I expected "server"-side vhost to be the same as "client" part (AKA virtio), > just > use another mechanism for exchanging control information (via socket). Is it > not > true? I suppose, driving queues from both sides should be quite symmetric. > At this stage of release adding these changes is difficult as I don't have knowledge on vhost. But at the same if anyone from committee would like to make these enhancements are welcome. Thanks, Reshma
