Hi Jingjing, On Wednesday, February 02/24/16, 2016 at 19:26:54 -0800, Wu, Jingjing wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Lakkireddy > > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 4:32 PM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > Cc: Kumar Sanghvi; Nirranjan Kirubaharan > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] ethdev: add a generic flow and new > > behavior switch to fdir > > > > Add a new raw packet flow that allows specifying generic flow input. > > > > Add the ability to provide masks for fields in flow to allow range of > > values. > > > > Add a new behavior switch. > > > > Add the ability to provide behavior arguments to allow rewriting matched > > fields with new values. Ex: allows to provide new ip and port addresses to > > rewrite the fields of packets matching a filter rule before NAT'ing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy at chelsio.com> > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras at chelsio.com> > > --- > > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst | 3 +++ > > lib/librte_ether/rte_eth_ctrl.h | 15 ++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst > > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst > > index 99de186..19ce954 100644 > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst > > @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ API Changes > > ABI Changes > > ----------- > > > > +* New flow type ``RTE_ETH_FLOW_RAW_PKT`` had been introduced and > > hence > > + ``RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX`` had been increased to 19. > > + > > > Great to see a raw_pkt_flow type. > And there is already a flow type "RTE_ETH_FLOW_RAW", it's not necessary to > add a new one.
I added a new type based on your feedback only http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/31386 So, do you want me to revert this change and use RTE_ETH_FLOW_RAW instead ? Thanks, Rahul.
