2016-02-23 10:03, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > > Are you OK with concept behind V2 PQoS patch as described above? > > > > So you mean that PQoS don't really need some DPDK integration? > > You just want to show how to use it with DPDK? > > You are correct. The technology can be used without tight DPDK integration > but will require users to reach out to existing open source code. > Based on received feedback about EAL PQoS extensions we backed off to sort of > a sample code.
If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in DPDK? Maybe the example should be better in the library itself. I suggest to mention the library in doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.rst
