On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Patches 2 and 3 have been merged to avoid a compilation error.
> > > Applied, thanks
> >
> > Actually, there was a ongoing discussion about patch 6, the handling
> > of VHOST_USER_SEND_RARP request:
> >
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-February/033539.html
> >
> > Maybe you have seen that and I didn't make it clear; my bad. Since you
> > have already applied it. I will make a standalone patch, and try to
> > send it out today.
>
> Yes I've wrongly understood there was no problem.
> The series would have not been applied if you had said that a new version
> was needed or if you had set the patchwork status to "Changes Requested".
Yeah, that's my bad. I meant to send it out soon, say, last Friday
night. However, I didn't make it. For the patchwork stuff, I'm
still gettig used to it. So, thanks for the tip. I will bear that
in mind next time.
> Sorry, we'll do better next times ;)
Yeah :)
A new patch will be sent out soon. Please consider to apply it. Or,
maybe we can hold it for a while, to see if someone else have comments.
I will ping you to apply it next week if no comments.
Thanks.
--yliu
