Hi David, On 02/16/2016 03:48 PM, David Hunt wrote: > v2: Kept all the NEXT_ABI defs to this patch so as to make the > previous patches easier to read, and also to imake it clear what > code is necessary to keep ABI compatibility when NEXT_ABI is > disabled. > > Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com> > --- > app/test/Makefile | 2 + > app/test/test_mempool_perf.c | 3 + > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 7 ++ > lib/librte_mempool/Makefile | 2 + > lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 240 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 68 ++++++++++- > 6 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Given the size of this patch, I don't think it's worth adding the NEXT ABI in that case. Regards, Olivier