On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com> wrote: > iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com> > Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org> > Acked-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin at rehivetech.com> > Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com> > --- > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > index 635ec36..a2a3485 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c > @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ rte_eal_iopl_init(void) > if (iopl(3) != 0) > return -1; > return 0; > +#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) > + return 0; /* iopl syscall not supported for ARM/ARM64 */ > #else > return -1; > #endif > -- > 1.7.9.5 >
Pl. merge this one too. Thanks
