> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:12 PM > To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers > > ... > > I liked the idea of Bruce of renaming these constants to *_YEAR and > *_MONTH. > I also think RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL should be RTE_VER_MINOR. > And maybe that RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE should be RTE_VER_RELEASE. > > It shouldn't hurt applications as they must use RTE_VERSION and > rte_version(). > > Opinions?
That seems like a good change. I'll resubmit. John. --
