Hi David, 
We use the same structure for device and queue level stats for simplicity.
But really bringing these 2 at device level as an aggregate level do not really 
make much sense at system evel (ie sum of of queue depth is irrelevant). The 
other ones are relevant. 
I don't think we should change this, it would just create confusion with users. 
That's a nack to me, let me know if unclear. 
Thanks
Nic


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2026 2:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; Chautru, Nicolas <[email protected]>; Maxime
> Coquelin <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH 01/10] bbdev: fix stats aggregation from queues
> 
> The device stats retrieval was missing aggregation of enqueue_status_count,
> acc_offload_cycles, and enqueue_depth_avail from per-queue statistics.
> 
> Fixes: 4f08028c5e24 ("bbdev: expose queue related warning and status")
> Cc: [email protected]
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]>
> ---
>  lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c index
> ea644c1f9b..90095578cb 100644
> --- a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> +++ b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ rte_bbdev_queue_stop(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t
> queue_id)  static void  get_stats_from_queues(struct rte_bbdev *dev, struct
> rte_bbdev_stats *stats)  {
> -     unsigned int q_id;
> +     unsigned int i, q_id;
>       for (q_id = 0; q_id < dev->data->num_queues; q_id++) {
>               struct rte_bbdev_stats *q_stats =
>                               &dev->data->queues[q_id].queue_stats;
> @@ -756,6 +756,10 @@ get_stats_from_queues(struct rte_bbdev *dev, struct
> rte_bbdev_stats *stats)
>               stats->dequeue_err_count += q_stats->dequeue_err_count;
>               stats->enqueue_warn_count += q_stats->enqueue_warn_count;
>               stats->dequeue_warn_count += q_stats->dequeue_warn_count;
> +             for (i = 0; i < RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_SIZE_MAX; i++)
> +                     stats->enqueue_status_count[i] += q_stats-
> >enqueue_status_count[i];
> +             stats->acc_offload_cycles += q_stats->acc_offload_cycles;
> +             stats->enqueue_depth_avail += q_stats->enqueue_depth_avail;
>       }
>       rte_bbdev_log_debug("Got stats on %u", dev->data->dev_id);  }
> --
> 2.54.0

Reply via email to