On Tue, 05 May 2026 09:01:43 +0200 Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > PS: I wonder if we really need to keep the transactional memory versions of > > stuff. > > I don't know, it's part of the API and has no maintenance cost. It is not tested, only worked on x86 and most of the CPU's and tooling dropped support for transactional memory years ago. It was a failed idea.
