The leaf node ID boundary is checked against the compile-time constant
`RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT` (1024) rather than the number of Tx queues
configured for the port. The rte_tm specification reserves IDs 0 to
(N-1) for leaf nodes, where N is the configured queue count, so using
the constant produces wrong results whenever N is less than 1024. Fix by
replacing the constant with the runtime queue count.

Also add an explicit check in the non-leaf validation path that rejects
IDs in the leaf-reserved range. This condition can be triggered
two ways: adding a leaf node before its parent chain is complete (the
node resolves to a non-leaf level), or assigning a leaf-range ID to a
node intended as non-leaf.

Fixes: 715d449a965b ("net/ice: enhance Tx scheduler hierarchy support")
Cc: [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_tm.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_tm.c b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_tm.c
index ff53f2acfd..7ee4070007 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_tm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_tm.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ ice_node_param_check(uint32_t node_id,
                      uint32_t priority, uint32_t weight,
                      const struct rte_tm_node_params *params,
                      bool is_leaf,
+                     uint16_t nb_txq,
                      struct rte_tm_error *error)
 {
        /* checked all the unsupported parameter */
@@ -123,6 +124,11 @@ ice_node_param_check(uint32_t node_id,
 
        /* for non-leaf node */
        if (!is_leaf) {
+               if (node_id < nb_txq) {
+                       error->type = RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_NODE_ID;
+                       error->message = "node ID is reserved for leaf nodes";
+                       return -EINVAL;
+               }
                if (params->nonleaf.wfq_weight_mode) {
                        error->type =
                                RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_NODE_PARAMS_WFQ_WEIGHT_MODE;
@@ -146,7 +152,7 @@ ice_node_param_check(uint32_t node_id,
        }
 
        /* for leaf node */
-       if (node_id >= RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT) {
+       if (node_id >= nb_txq) {
                error->type = RTE_TM_ERROR_TYPE_NODE_ID;
                error->message = "Node ID out of range for a leaf node.";
                return -EINVAL;
@@ -440,7 +446,8 @@ ice_tm_node_add(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint32_t node_id,
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
 
-               ret = ice_node_param_check(node_id, priority, weight, params, 
false, error);
+               ret = ice_node_param_check(node_id, priority, weight, params, 
false,
+                               dev->data->nb_tx_queues, error);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
 
@@ -479,7 +486,8 @@ ice_tm_node_add(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint32_t node_id,
        }
 
        ret = ice_node_param_check(node_id, priority, weight,
-                       params, level_id == ice_get_leaf_level(pf), error);
+                       params, level_id == ice_get_leaf_level(pf),
+                       dev->data->nb_tx_queues, error);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to