Data DMA used m->data_off of uninitialized mbufs instead of
RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM, potentially causing Rx data to be
placed at the wrong alignment in the mbuf.

Fixes: 947d860c821f ("enic: improve Rx performance")
Signed-off-by: John Daley <johndale at cisco.com>
---
 drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c | 5 +++--
 drivers/net/enic/enic_rx.c   | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c b/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
index be4e9e5..646d87f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
@@ -354,10 +354,11 @@ enic_alloc_rx_queue_mbufs(struct enic *enic, struct 
vnic_rq *rq)
                        return -ENOMEM;
                }

-               dma_addr = (dma_addr_t)(mb->buf_physaddr + mb->data_off);
+               dma_addr = (dma_addr_t)(mb->buf_physaddr
+                          + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);

                rq_enet_desc_enc(rqd, dma_addr, RQ_ENET_TYPE_ONLY_SOP,
-                                mb->buf_len);
+                                mb->buf_len - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
                rq->mbuf_ring[i] = mb;
        }

diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/enic_rx.c b/drivers/net/enic/enic_rx.c
index 232987a..39bb55c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_rx.c
@@ -314,9 +314,11 @@ enic_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
                                 + rx_id);

                /* Push descriptor for newly allocated mbuf */
-               dma_addr = (dma_addr_t)(nmb->buf_physaddr + nmb->data_off);
+               dma_addr = (dma_addr_t)(nmb->buf_physaddr
+                          + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
                rqd_ptr->address = rte_cpu_to_le_64(dma_addr);
-               rqd_ptr->length_type = cpu_to_le16(nmb->buf_len);
+               rqd_ptr->length_type = cpu_to_le16(nmb->buf_len
+                                      - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);

                /* Fill in the rest of the mbuf */
                rxmb->data_off = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
-- 
2.7.0

Reply via email to