On 2025/8/13 22:51, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:33:16 +0800
> Dengdui Huang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> +static void
>> +hns3_uninit_hardware(struct hns3_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +    struct hns3_adapter *hns = HNS3_DEV_HW_TO_ADAPTER(hw);
>> +
>> +    (void)hns3_uninit_umv_space(hw);
> 
> Overall, the patch looks good. But why the (void) cast here.
> The compiler allows ignoring return value unless the must check attribute is 
> set.

Our internal coding standards require that when we do not check the return 
value of a function,
we use `(void)` to indicate that we have thoroughly considered that it is 
unnecessary to handle the return value here.

Reply via email to