On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:40:08 -0700
"dimon.zhao" <dimon.z...@nebula-matrix.com> wrote:
> +
> +static int nbl_eth_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> +{
> + const struct nbl_adapter *adapter = ETH_DEV_TO_NBL_DEV_PF_PRIV(eth_dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> + ret = nbl_core_init(adapter, eth_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + NBL_LOG(INFO, "core init failed ret %d", ret);
> + goto eth_init_failed;
> + }
> +
> + ret = nbl_core_start(adapter);
> + if (ret) {
> + NBL_LOG(INFO, "core start failed ret %d", ret);
> + nbl_core_remove(adapter);
> + goto eth_init_failed;
> + }
> +
> + eth_dev->dev_ops = &nbl_eth_dev_ops;
> + return 0;
> +
> +eth_init_failed:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * @brief: nbl device pci probe
> + * @param[in]: {rte_pci_driver} *pci_drv
> + * @param[in]: {rte_pci_device} *pci_dev
> + * @return: {0-success,negative-fail}
> + */
> +static int nbl_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv __rte_unused,
> + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
> +{
> + return rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_probe(pci_dev, sizeof(struct
> nbl_adapter),
> + nbl_eth_dev_init);
> +}
> +
Since device doesn't support secondary process, it would make sense to
detect that in probe handling and return error in secondary.
