> From: Ivan Malov [mailto:ivan.ma...@arknetworks.am] > Sent: Saturday, 2 August 2025 23.34 > > Hi, > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2025, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:07:31 +0000 > > Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com> wrote: > > > >> + RTE_ETHDEV_LOG_LINE(DEBUG, > >> + "Ethdev port_id=%d tx_queue_id=%d, Tx offload %s > potential conflict with per-port Tx offload %s, " > >> + "runtime support depends on the driver", > > > > Shorten the message, and get it on one line. > > When a message is so long it won't fit on one line, it is too verbose. > > I am not an expert in naming, but on the premise that 'ethdev' is > already > printed by 'RTE_ETHDEV_LOG_LINE', perhaps consider this variant: > > "id=%d txq=%d offload clash %s vs dev %s: PMD to decide" > > Thank you.
Ivan's suggestion is good, but this file has plenty of long (and even multi-line) log messages, e.g. [1]: if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa) != local_conf.offloads) { RTE_ETHDEV_LOG_LINE(ERR, "Ethdev port_id=%d tx_queue_id=%d, new added offloads 0x%"PRIx64" must be " "within per-queue offload capabilities 0x%"PRIx64" in %s()", port_id, tx_queue_id, local_conf.offloads, dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa, __func__); return -EINVAL; } [1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v25.07/source/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c#L2703 Which do you prefer: a) Follow the local coding style for log messages, or b) Follow our general coding style, and log as Ivan suggested?