On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:29 PM Andre Muezerie <andre...@linux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > Coverity complained about an overflow in a recently added function: > > https://scan4.scan.coverity.com/#/project-view/66295/10075?selectedIssue=461876 > > CID 461876: (#1 of 1): Overflowed constant (INTEGER_OVERFLOW) > 21. overflow_const: Expression powi, which is equal to 0, where base is > known to be equal to 1024, overflows the type that receives it, an > unsigned integer 64 bits wide. > > This complaint was a false positive, but it revealed that the function > could be written in a simpler way, making the code more readable and > likely allowing Coverity to make the right determination. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andre...@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand
