On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:14:09AM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> >
> > I'd vote for this one, as it sounds very clean to me. This would also
> > solve the block issue of this patch. Though it would break OVS, I'm thinking
> > that'd be okay, as OVS has dependence on DPDK version: what we need to
> > do is just to send few patches to OVS, and let it points to next release,
> > say DPDK v16.07. Flavio, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> There is a plan to use vHost PMD,
Great.
> so from OVS point of view the virtio
> stuff would be hidden because vhost PMD would look like just as a
> regular ethernet, right?
Yes.
--yliu
