On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 17:06:03 +0800
Feifei Wang <wff_li...@vip.163.com> wrote:

> +     (void)hinic3_mutex_unlock(&nic_dev->pause_mutuex);

Please don't add extra (void) here.
That is an older style used when C code was using lint.

And if you have an internal mutex_unlock function why is it returning
a value anyway. Should be void function.

Reply via email to