> From: Andrew Rybchenko [mailto:andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru] > Sent: Sunday, 30 March 2025 10.29 > > On 2/28/25 19:48, Morten Brørup wrote: > > Bulk requests to get or put objects in a mempool often vary in size. > > A series of tests with pseudo random request sizes, to mitigate the > > benefits of the CPU's dynamic branch predictor, was added. > > > > Also, various other minor changes: > > - Improved the output formatting for readability. > > - Added test for the "default" mempool with cache. > > - Skip the tests for the "default" mempool, if it happens to use the > same > > driver (i.e. operations) as already tested. > > - Replaced bare use of "unsigned" with "unsigned int", > > to make checkpatches happy. > > IMHO, it would be much better and easier to review if all above changes > are done one by one in separate patches. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com> > > Overall the idea looks good, so > Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> > > but I'd be thankful if you split the patch.
OK. I'll post a v2 with changes one by one in a series of patches. <sarcasm about the write-only mailing list> Let's hope someone else finds the series of simple patches sufficiently readable to care to review. ;-) </sarcasm> Thanks, Andrew.
