Compiling without enabled RTE_ASSERT leads to an error during
initialization
Fix incorrect assert conditions

Fixes: ff04525d90d3 ("net/ntnic: replace assert with RTE assert")

Signed-off-by: Serhii Iliushyk <sil-...@napatech.com>
---
 drivers/net/ntnic/adapter/nt4ga_adapter.c          | 8 +++++---
 drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_filter/flow_nthw_flm.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ntnic/adapter/nt4ga_adapter.c 
b/drivers/net/ntnic/adapter/nt4ga_adapter.c
index a9ae1fa3f8..cb80c718c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ntnic/adapter/nt4ga_adapter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ntnic/adapter/nt4ga_adapter.c
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static int nt4ga_adapter_init(struct adapter_info_s 
*p_adapter_info)
        fpga_info_t *fpga_info = &p_adapter_info->fpga_info;
        hw_info_t *p_hw_info = &p_adapter_info->hw_info;
 
+       RTE_ASSERT(fpga_info);
+
        /*
         * IMPORTANT: Most variables cannot be determined before nthw fpga 
model is instantiated
         * (nthw_fpga_init())
@@ -155,15 +157,15 @@ static int nt4ga_adapter_init(struct adapter_info_s 
*p_adapter_info)
        }
 
 #ifdef RTE_ENABLE_ASSERT
-       RTE_ASSERT(fpga_info);
-       p_fpga = fpga_info->mp_fpga;
-       RTE_ASSERT(p_fpga);
        n_phy_ports = fpga_info->n_phy_ports;
        RTE_ASSERT(n_phy_ports >= 1);
        n_nim_ports = fpga_info->n_nims;
        RTE_ASSERT(n_nim_ports >= 1);
 #endif
 
+       p_fpga = fpga_info->mp_fpga;
+       RTE_ASSERT(p_fpga);
+
        /* Nt4ga Init Filter */
        nt4ga_filter_t *p_filter = &p_adapter_info->nt4ga_filter;
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_filter/flow_nthw_flm.c 
b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_filter/flow_nthw_flm.c
index 9bae6a32c8..a56d3c5038 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_filter/flow_nthw_flm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_filter/flow_nthw_flm.c
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ int flm_nthw_buf_ctrl_update(const struct flm_nthw *p, 
uint32_t *lrn_free, uint3
        if (ret == 0) {
                nthw_rac_rab_read32_dma(rac, bus_id, address_bufctrl, 2, 
&bc_buf);
                ret = rac->m_dma_active ? nthw_rac_rab_dma_commit(rac) : -1;
-               RTE_ASSERT(ret == -1);
+               RTE_ASSERT(ret != -1);
                rte_spinlock_unlock(&rac->m_mutex);
 
                if (ret != 0)
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ int flm_nthw_lrn_data_flush(const struct flm_nthw *p, const 
uint32_t *data, uint
                        nthw_rac_rab_read32_dma(rac, bus_id, address_bufctrl, 
2, &bc_buf);
 
                        int ret = rac->m_dma_active ? 
nthw_rac_rab_dma_commit(rac) : -1;
-                       RTE_ASSERT(ret == -1);
+                       RTE_ASSERT(ret != -1);
                        rte_spinlock_unlock(&rac->m_mutex);
                        if (ret != 0)
                                return -1;
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ int flm_nthw_inf_sta_data_update(const struct flm_nthw *p, 
uint32_t *inf_data,
 
                nthw_rac_rab_read32_dma(rac, bus_id, address_bufctrl, 2, 
&bc_buf);
                ret = rac->m_dma_active ? nthw_rac_rab_dma_commit(rac) : -1;
-               RTE_ASSERT(ret == -1);
+               RTE_ASSERT(ret != -1);
                rte_spinlock_unlock(&rac->m_mutex);
 
                if (ret != 0)
-- 
2.45.0

Reply via email to